Decarbonising the Gas Grid – Regulation vs Investment?

Share our blog

This graphic is a detailed summary of a recently concluded EMPIR project “Decarbonising the Gas Grid”, co-funded by the EU’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme and the EMPIR Participating States. This is a verbatim description of the intent:

“This project will be the first large scale project of its kind that will tackle four measurement challenges that the gas industry needs to solve before they can decarbonise the gas grid through introduction of biomethane, hydrogen-enriched natural gas, 100 % hydrogen, and carbon capture and storage (CCS). The project will cover the priority challenges within flow metering, gas composition, physical properties and safety (including monitoring of gas leaks).”

Given the sources of funding, I don’t think it’s unreasonable to assume that the EU Commission will be guided by this work and its recommendations when it comes to defining and agreeing its (slowly emergent) emissions legislation, which aims to reduce carbon emissions from its domestic industries.

EMPIR Image
www.decarbgrid.eu

The question I’m addressing here is what would this mean for individual companies? Below is a slightly modified version of the ‘gas grids’ graphic which appears above:

Decarb pictures

I predict two outcomes:

  1. Every company that sits at a key point in this grid – put simply, every company that sits at one of the arrowheads – will need to provide verified measurements (metrology) on the historic and current flow rates, composition, physical properties and fugitive emissions of the gas they are inputting to the grid.
  2. Every company that utilises this gas in some way – to generate power, as feedstock for the chemical industry, to manufacture fertiliser etc etc – will need to be able to look back along its supply chain (in addition to doing its own verified metrology) and account for the carbon emissions therein. Companies supplying gas to the grid – especially via pipeline or LNG – will also need to ‘carbon account’ along their supply chain.

Let me be clear, this is my guess at the consequences of as yet fully developed EU regulatory plans.

However, as we reviewed in our recent blog, Unveiling Britain’s Climate Paradox in the case of the U.K politically ambitious plans might have unintended consequences such as EU industries offshoring to countries with less demanding regulatory environments – or more investment in industries and technologies – and doing this despite the EU introducing a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism – CBAM, see Living with CBAM! 

A sub-text here is whether the new U.K. government, seemingly keen to normalise relationships with the EU, adopts similar regulations. Or will they adopt an investment strategy such as the Inflation Reduction Act in the USA?

Regulation vs Investment?

 

Future Energy Partners provide expert service for the full upstream value chain and asset management, offering consultancy that aligns with the latest regulations and policy. In addition to a general introduction to CBAM, we can assist you with:

  • digital technology to aid carbon accounting
  • measuring methane emissions and flaring
  • gas-to-power solutions
  • carbon capture and storage assessments.

Our comprehensive expertise in the energy sector allows us to support your projects from concept to completion. To find out how we can help you navigate the evolving energy landscape and achieve your sustainability goals, contact us today.

References: 

www.decarbgrid.eu

This website uses cookies and asks your personal data to enhance your browsing experience.