Why Environmental, Social and Governance strategy is critical for global energy security
- 22 April 2025
- Posted by: Greg Coleman
- Category: energy transition

A question of priorities
Energy security is an outcome from having a diverse supply, a cost competitive supply and an environmentally/ESG responsible supply.
Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) frameworks have come under renewed scrutiny in an increasingly polarised geopolitical landscape. Nowhere is this more evident than in the shifting climate policy of the United States under President Donald Trump.
Since returning to office in January 2025, President Trump has taken significant steps that signal a departure from previous climate commitments. His administration has withdrawn the U.S. from the Paris Climate Accords and the World Health Organization and initiated a trade war with China.
Trump has long championed traditional oil and gas industries, often repeating the phrase “drill baby drill”. He views fossil fuel extraction as both a competitive advantage and a strategic lever to revitalise American manufacturing and heavy industry. His focus on resource-rich areas like Greenland, Canada and Ukraine underscores this strategy.
Uncertainty undermines investment
These policy shifts are already reshaping financial priorities. Our blog, The Challenges of ESG Post-Trump explored how Donald Trump’s policies are impacting ESG initiatives in the United States. ESG has become a politically charged term, prompting many companies to reframe their sustainability efforts under less controversial labels like risk management or innovation. Meanwhile, recent regulatory changes by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission have made it harder for investors to influence corporate behaviour through shareholder resolutions, creating a more challenging environment for sustainable investing.
Despite this shift, global momentum for ESG remains strong, particularly in Europe, where firms continue to prioritise climate commitments. Many businesses are increasingly relying on technology—such as satellite data and AI—to drive emissions reduction.
While the political climate may have changed, climate risk is still recognised as financial risk, and investors are adapting with new tools and strategies to promote sustainable progress.
Trump’s legacy also includes intensifying trade tensions with China, significantly impacting liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports from the US. Since February 2025, LNG shipments from the US to China have ceased, removing an estimated 45 billion tonne-miles from global shipping and affecting up to 90 cargoes annually.
Some of this lost trade has shifted towards Europe, but the disruption highlights a bigger issue: energy dependence is a vulnerability. Nations that rely heavily on imported fossil fuels are at greater risk when global tensions rise.
Green energy investment as national strategy
In contrast, many nations see ESG not just as an environmental obligation but as a national security priority.
In last week’s LEADING podcast, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese discussed Australia’s renewable energy initiatives, highlighting the strategic importance of projects such as the Australia-Asia PowerLink. Australia is constructing one of the world’s largest solar farms, with the goal of exporting clean electricity. This is more than a climate ambition—it is a strategy for energy independence and regional influence.

ESG as security strategy
The debate about ESG isn’t just about values—it’s about security. Energy independence, investor confidence and regulatory stability all hinge on the ability to align with a low-carbon, socially responsible future.
The countries and companies leading the charge on ESG are not just reducing emissions; they are securing their place in the future global order.
Why ESG still matters
At Future Energy Partners, we work with companies navigating the complex transition from hydrocarbons to cleaner energy solutions. We see firsthand that ESG is not simply a set of environmental metrics—it’s a strategic framework for resilience, relevance and long-term competitiveness.
While fossil fuels remain part of the near-term reality, ESG enables companies and countries alike to future-proof against shocks—whether they be geopolitical, environmental, or economic.
References
Future Energy Partners: https://future-energy-partners.com/insights/
Reuters: https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/chinas-lng-imports-shift-amid-trade-war-2025-04-16/
The Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/article/2024/aug/21/suncable-solar-farm-nt-approved
LEADING Podcast: https://www.podbean.com/media/share/dir-fibq3-24fd3396
The Business Standard: https://www.tbsnews.net/bloomberg-special/clash-green-billionaires-upends-asias-undersea-solar-quest-567898#lg=1&slide=0
International Energy Agency (IEA): https://www.iea.org