Customise consent preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site.... 

Always active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display

Why Environmental, Social and Governance strategy is critical for global energy security

A question of priorities

Energy security is an outcome from having a diverse supply, a cost competitive supply and an environmentally/ESG responsible supply. 

 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) frameworks have come under renewed scrutiny in an increasingly polarised geopolitical landscape. Nowhere is this more evident than in the shifting climate policy of the United States under President Donald Trump.

Share our blog

Since returning to office in January 2025, President Trump has taken significant steps that signal a departure from previous climate commitments. His administration has withdrawn the U.S. from the Paris Climate Accords and the World Health Organization and initiated a trade war with China.

Trump has long championed traditional oil and gas industries, often repeating the phrase “drill baby drill”. He views fossil fuel extraction as both a competitive advantage and a strategic lever to revitalise American manufacturing and heavy industry. His focus on resource-rich areas like Greenland, Canada and Ukraine underscores this strategy.​

Uncertainty undermines investment

These policy shifts are already reshaping financial priorities. Our blog, The Challenges of ESG Post-Trump explored how Donald Trump’s policies are impacting ESG initiatives in the United States. ESG has become a politically charged term, prompting many companies to reframe their sustainability efforts under less controversial labels like risk management or innovation. Meanwhile, recent regulatory changes by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission have made it harder for investors to influence corporate behaviour through shareholder resolutions, creating a more challenging environment for sustainable investing.

Despite this shift, global momentum for ESG remains strong, particularly in Europe, where firms continue to prioritise climate commitments. Many businesses are increasingly relying on technology—such as satellite data and AI—to drive emissions reduction.

While the political climate may have changed, climate risk is still recognised as financial risk, and investors are adapting with new tools and strategies to promote sustainable progress.

Trump’s legacy also includes intensifying trade tensions with China, significantly impacting liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports from the US. Since February 2025, LNG shipments from the US to China have ceased, removing an estimated 45 billion tonne-miles from global shipping and affecting up to 90 cargoes annually.​

Some of this lost trade has shifted towards Europe, but the disruption highlights a bigger issue: energy dependence is a vulnerability. Nations that rely heavily on imported fossil fuels are at greater risk when global tensions rise.​

LNG shipping
It was predicted that the US would supply China with about 5–6 million tonnes of LNG in 2025, equivalent to approximately 80–90 shipments.
Green energy investment as national strategy

In contrast, many nations see ESG not just as an environmental obligation but as a national security priority.​

In last week’s LEADING podcast, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese discussed Australia’s renewable energy initiatives, highlighting the strategic importance of projects such as the Australia-Asia PowerLink. Australia is constructing one of the world’s largest solar farms, with the goal of exporting clean electricity. This is more than a climate ambition—it is a strategy for energy independence and regional influence.

There is an enormous opportunity for Australia to become a renewable energy superpower
Anthony Albanese
Anthony Albanese
Prime Minister
Sun Cable’s proposed link from Australia to Singapore.Source: Bloomberg
Sun Cable’s proposed link from Australia to Singapore.Source: Bloomberg
ESG as security strategy

The debate about ESG isn’t just about values—it’s about security. Energy independence, investor confidence and regulatory stability all hinge on the ability to align with a low-carbon, socially responsible future.​

The countries and companies leading the charge on ESG are not just reducing emissions; they are securing their place in the future global order.​

Why ESG still matters

At Future Energy Partners, we work with companies navigating the complex transition from hydrocarbons to cleaner energy solutions. We see firsthand that ESG is not simply a set of environmental metrics—it’s a strategic framework for resilience, relevance and long-term competitiveness.​

While fossil fuels remain part of the near-term reality, ESG enables companies and countries alike to future-proof against shocks—whether they be geopolitical, environmental, or economic.​